The Importance of a Philosophical Construct in Evaluating Psychiatric Symptoms Part 3

  • Dr. Ashoka Jahnavi Prasad

Abstract

This article, the author’s part 3 of continuing series, explores the aims of family therapy, focusing on the therapist's role in navigating mutual blame, conflicting narratives, and emotional tensions within families. It contrasts two models—the therapist as Freud, who applies specialized psychological knowledge, and the therapist as Socrates, who fosters open dialogue. Additionally, it examines ethical concerns such as neutrality, truth, and manipulation. The discussion extends to human values, questioning their adaptability in light of evolving societal and technological changes.

References

1.Stancombe J ,S.White ; Cause and responsibility: towards an interactional understanding of blaming and ‘neutrality’ in family therapy;( https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00326.x ) Accessed on 18th March,2025
2. Glover, Jonathan (1976). The Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-875038-2. LCCN 77362023.
3. O'Reilly, M. (2014). Blame and accountability in family therapy: Making sense of therapeutic spaces discursively. Qualitative Psychology, 1(2), 163–177.
4. Glover, Jonathan (1988). I: The Philosophy and Psychology of Personal Identity. London: Allen Lane. ISBN 0-7139-9001-5. LCCN 87083462.
Published
2025-04-12
How to Cite
Dr. Ashoka Jahnavi Prasad. (2025). The Importance of a Philosophical Construct in Evaluating Psychiatric Symptoms Part 3. The Indian Practitioner, 78(03), 21-23. Retrieved from https://articles.theindianpractitioner.com/index.php/tip/article/view/1879

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>