Status of Obstetric Morbidities in Maharashtra

  • Chauhan S, Kulkarni R
Keywords: obstetric morbidity, acute, chronic, Maharashtra

Abstract

Introduction
Obstetric (maternal) morbidity is any health condition attributed to and/or aggravated by pregnancy and childbirth that has a negative impact on the woman’s wellbeing. Its prevalence status and trend in Maharashtra is reviewed to inform the medical fraternity.
Method
Literature search with keywords was carried out through computerized databases – Pubmed, Cochrane library and Google for the studies conducted in the last two decades. State and central health ministry websites were searched for relevant service records (HMIS). The findings of studies and databases were compiled, tabulated and interpreted to describe the status of obstetric morbidities in Maharashtra.
Results
Studies for review were found to be very limited. The major acute obstetric morbidities were Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (2% to 7.8%); Eclampsia (0.25% to 0.60%); Post-partum haemorrhage (3.2%); Antepartum haemorrhage (4.1%); and Obstructed labour (1.9%). Major chronic obstetric morbidities were Genital Prolapse (0.9% to 7.1%); Chronic PID (2.5%); Secondary infertility (1.7%); and Genital fistula (0.08% to 1.6%). A high level of anaemia (69.5%) with severe anemia (12%) is prevalent among women. Over the last five years, there has been good improvement in maternal health indicators in Maharashtra indicating a possible reduction in the level of obstetric morbidities.
Conclusion
The availability of very few studies for review limits the conclusive evidence on the current magnitude of obstetric morbidities in Maharashtra; however, it does indicate the existence of major obstetric morbidities. Fresh studies are needed to capture the current status within the improving background of maternal health indicators.

References

1. Reichenheim ME, Zylbersztajn F, Moraes C L, Lobato G. Severe acute obstetric morbidity (near-miss): a review of the relative use of its diagnostic indicators. Arch GynecolObstet. 2009; 280: 337-43
2. Say L et al., WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Classifications. Maternal near miss–towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009,23:287–296.
3. Fortney J, Reproductive Morbidity : A conceptual Framework, Family Health International Working Papers. No. WP95-02; September 1995
4. MMR Ratio Bulletin. 2011-13, http://www.censusindia. gov.in/vital_statistics/mmr_bulletin_2011-13.pdf, accesed on 4th July 2015
5. National Health System Resource Centre,National Rural Health Mission, Ministry of Health& Family Welfare, Government of India. http://nhsrcindia.org/ index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18 4&Itemid=681, accessed on 4th July 2015
6. District level household survey report, IV, 2007-08, International Institute of Population sciences, Deonar, Mumbai. http://www.rchiips.org/DLHS-4.html, accessed on 5th July 2015
7. District level household survey report, III, 2007-08, International Institute of Population sciences, Deonar, Mumbai. http://www.rchiips.org/PRCH-3.html, accessed on 5th July 2015.
8. Sajith M, Nimbargi V, Modi A, Sumariya R, Pawar A. Incidence of pregnancy induced hypertension and prescription pattern of antihypertensive drugs in pregnancy. International Journal of Pharma Sciences and Research. Apr.2014;5(4)
9. Rachkonda L, Rawte S, Ruiwale S. The clinical study of antepartum haemorrhage. International Journal of Recent Trends in Science And Technology, 2014;12(3):581-588
10. Chhabra S, Gandhi D, Jaiswal M. Obstruced labour – A preventable entity, J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;20(2):151- 3.
11. Rani Bang R, Abhay Bang A, M. Hanimi ReddyMahesh D. Deshmukh, Sanjay B. Baitule and Veronique Filippi, Maternal morbidity during labour&puerperium in rural homes & the need for medical attention: A prospective observational study in Gadchiroli, India. Int J Obs&Gyn. 2004 March 2004
12. Kapadia-Kundu N. and Kulkarni G.R., ‘Physical Abuse and Its Implications for the Reproductive Health of Women in Rural India’, (March 2004) Indian Institute of Health Management unpublished
13. Kulkarni R, Chauhan S, Daver R, Nandanwar Y, Patil A, Bhosale A, A Prospective Observational Study of “Near Miss” ObstetricEvents and Maternal deaths in Tertiary Hospitals of Mumbai, Annual report NIRRH, 2014-15
14. Chauhan S, Kulkarni R, Agarwal D. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Chronic Obstetric morbidities in Nashik District, Maharashtra, India , Indian Journal of Medical Research. In press
15. Psychosocial, cultural and service factors affecting reproductive morbidity among rural women in Maharashtra, summary report by S.K. Singh Rajiv Prasad Ravi K.VermaArvindPandey, International Institute of Population Sciences, Govandi, Mumbai, http://www.iipsindia.org/pdf/05_b_012repro_morbidity. pdf, accessed on 6th July 2015
Published
2019-08-12
How to Cite
Chauhan S, Kulkarni R. (2019). Status of Obstetric Morbidities in Maharashtra. The Indian Practitioner, 68(7), 60-65. Retrieved from https://articles.theindianpractitioner.com/index.php/tip/article/view/593